Wahlberg changes his training often, but the routine below is one of his defaults when he wants to add size to his biceps fast. The workout is simple, brutal, and very old-school—the goal being to hit the biceps from every angle while using the full
Seated Preacher Curl 3 sets 10,8,6Reps 90 sec rest(Don't have access do single arm dumbbell preacher curl on incline bench)
Ez-Bar Curl 3 Sets 10,8,6Reps 90 sec rest
Machine Curl 3 sets 10,8,6 Reps 90 sec rest
You will notice gains to your Biceps- Mark Wahlberg
What I disagree with is that failure stuff. If you are doing 3-5 reps then YES, failure is optional because you are effectively stimulating all available muscle fibers. But if you go to the 6-12 rep range, then failure is not optional anymore. You have to go to failure to stimulate those high threshold fibers.
Furthermore, this is way too much. There is no way you are going to make progressions from this type of workout. You are simply creating too many nerve paths and confusing the hell out of your muscles. If you do 21 sets for biceps then how many will you do for legs? 61?
In my personal opinion this workout is only for the advanced athlete and the chemically enhanced athletes. Advanced would be someone like Scott who can rep out 225 bench press, 315 squats, 400lbs deadlifts. Chemically enhanced would be someone who is stacking test,HGH and insulin (!).
If you are a beginner or intermediate and you cant destroy your biceps with 4 sets of weighted chin-ups and 2-3 sets of barbell curls, you are doing something wrong. Either your technique is wrong or your intensity is not there.
I would love to see different opinions from different Hermanites.
#HTH!
Kostas
Muscular Strength Athlete and Content Manager
6 Years Lifting Experience
Bachelors in Molecular Chemistry/Biochemistry, Working towards Masters
Lifting Style & Philosophy : Aikido, Energy, Balance, Flexibility, Posture
What I disagree with is that failure stuff. If you are doing 3-5 reps then YES, failure is optional because you are effectively stimulating all available muscle fibers. But if you go to the 6-12 rep range, then failure is not optional anymore. You have to go to failure to stimulate those high threshold fibers.
Furthermore, this is way too much. There is no way you are going to make progressions from this type of workout. You are simply creating too many nerve paths and confusing the hell out of your muscles. If you do 21 sets for biceps then how many will you do for legs? 61?
In my personal opinion this workout is only for the advanced athlete and the chemically enhanced athletes. Advanced would be someone like Scott who can rep out 225 bench press, 315 squats, 400lbs deadlifts. Chemically enhanced would be someone who is stacking test,HGH and insulin (!).
If you are a beginner or intermediate and you cant destroy your biceps with 4 sets of weighted chin-ups and 2-3 sets of barbell curls, you are doing something wrong. Either your technique is wrong or your intensity is not there.
I would love to see different opinions from different Hermanites.
#HTH!
Kostas
Totaly agree with Kostas! There is an overload of volume here!! An indermate even a professional fitness athlete needs 3-5 working exercises, (12-16 working sets) for them biceps. Second of all i thing the rest times are way to much! As i know it is better to do less sets but with higher intesity than doing a lot of sets and resting a lot between them.
What I disagree with is that failure stuff. If you are doing 3-5 reps then YES, failure is optional because you are effectively stimulating all available muscle fibers. But if you go to the 6-12 rep range, then failure is not optional anymore. You have to go to failure to stimulate those high threshold fibers.
Furthermore, this is way too much. There is no way you are going to make progressions from this type of workout. You are simply creating too many nerve paths and confusing the hell out of your muscles. If you do 21 sets for biceps then how many will you do for legs? 61?
In my personal opinion this workout is only for the advanced athlete and the chemically enhanced athletes. Advanced would be someone like Scott who can rep out 225 bench press, 315 squats, 400lbs deadlifts. Chemically enhanced would be someone who is stacking test,HGH and insulin (!).
If you are a beginner or intermediate and you cant destroy your biceps with 4 sets of weighted chin-ups and 2-3 sets of barbell curls, you are doing something wrong. Either your technique is wrong or your intensity is not there.
I would love to see different opinions from different Hermanites.
#HTH!
Kostas
Kostas, couldn't agree more here! I was just about to write all that stuff until I read your comment. I seriously don't understand why people try to do so many exercises and sets when you can train to failure utilising tempo and be fatigued in 4 sets!
Sport Rehabilitation BSc GSR
Sport Rehabilitator and S&C coach at Boston United FC
Super Hermanite
Twitter: Daniel_Meyer99
Kostas, couldn't agree more here! I was just about to write all that stuff until I read your comment. I seriously don't understand why people try to do so many exercises and sets when you can train to failure utilising tempo and be fatigued in 4 sets!
yea man exactly. There has also been research that clearly proves that one set ( your first set) is usually responsible for 80-90% of the growth caused by the entire workout. If you do it correctly of course ( tempo, overload, technique..etc.). The other 10-20% is set 2,3 and 4 and then you are just wasting your time. By set 6 you are causing practically 0 extra growth..Damn!
I m almost entirely sure that all these guys are on gear and thats why they might be benefiting from those types of workouts.
Muscular Strength Athlete and Content Manager
6 Years Lifting Experience
Bachelors in Molecular Chemistry/Biochemistry, Working towards Masters
Lifting Style & Philosophy : Aikido, Energy, Balance, Flexibility, Posture
Seated Preacher Curl 3 sets 10,8,6Reps 90 sec rest(Don't have access do single arm dumbbell preacher curl on incline bench)
Ez-Bar Curl 3 Sets 10,8,6Reps 90 sec rest
Machine Curl 3 sets 10,8,6 Reps 90 sec rest
You will notice gains to your Biceps- Mark Wahlberg
I'm in agreement with Kostas and Daniel here. For a beginner this is definitely too much volume. For the serious advanced athlete like Scott, Mark Whalburg, myself and others this routine would actually be suitable. Sometimes you have to beat the muscle sensless to make it grow. Like Mark said up top, this is only a workout he does when he needs to put on mass quick for a role in a movie. I've been making gains in my biceps by only doing 16 working sets per bicep workout. I train my biceps twice per week with 3-4 days rest in between sessions. Here's my typical bicep workout for muscle gain that would even be suitable for a beginner to follow:
Bicep/triceps workout:
1 arm cable curl: 4 sets of 15-20 reps per arm. (warm-up)
Rope cable push-downs: 4 sets of 15-20 reps. (warm-up)
1) EZ bar curl using outer grip: 4 sets of 10-15 reps.
2) Close grip bench press: 4 sets of 10-15 reps.
3) Alternating dumbbell curl standing: 4 sets of 8-12 reps.
4) Over head dumbbell extension: 4 sets of 8-12 reps.
5) Machine preacher curl with narrow grip: 4 sets of 10-15 reps.
6) EZ bar skull crushers: 4 sets of 10-15 reps.
This is my staple routine that I follow. I alternate between the EZ bar curl and straight bar curl each workout. I also alternate the alternate dumbbell curl with dumbbell hammer curls every other workout. For skull crushers I alternate between doing them on the flat bench and the decline bench.
44 Post(s)Gender: MaleGoal: Gain MuscleDate Joined: April 4, 2013
Posted
That sounds like some crap he (or someone else) made up. I've been lifting less than a year and my biceps are just about that same size.....I'm not special, either. He would win the ab contest, though...lol.
*edit - I combined multiple posts.
Been working out for about 6 months as of Oct. 2013, had good results with Scott's advice. Not much of a credential, really...haha.
What I disagree with is that failure stuff. If you are doing 3-5 reps then YES, failure is optional because you are effectively stimulating all available muscle fibers. But if you go to the 6-12 rep range, then failure is not optional anymore. You have to go to failure to stimulate those high threshold fibers.
Furthermore, this is way too much. There is no way you are going to make progressions from this type of workout. You are simply creating too many nerve paths and confusing the hell out of your muscles. If you do 21 sets for biceps then how many will you do for legs? 61?
In my personal opinion this workout is only for the advanced athlete and the chemically enhanced athletes. Advanced would be someone like Scott who can rep out 225 bench press, 315 squats, 400lbs deadlifts. Chemically enhanced would be someone who is stacking test,HGH and insulin (!).
If you are a beginner or intermediate and you cant destroy your biceps with 4 sets of weighted chin-ups and 2-3 sets of barbell curls, you are doing something wrong. Either your technique is wrong or your intensity is not there.
I would love to see different opinions from different Hermanites.
#HTH!
Kostas
As much as I love seeing Marky Mark progress (Please don't beat me up, Mr. Wahlberg!)...this routine is for the HIGHLY advanced and crazy insane. I stick to 3, 4 exercises per muscle group MAX with those rep ranges and 4 sets for SMALL muscle groups (biceps are a small muscle group). I do 3 exercises on average with rep range max being 12, and max 4 sets....and I'm huffing and puffing by the time I'm done, with biceps COMPLETELY engorged with blood...which is what I want to do. My advice? Don't listen to what celebs tell you, DO WHAT WORKS FOR YOU!
What I disagree with is that failure stuff. If you are doing 3-5 reps then YES, failure is optional because you are effectively stimulating all available muscle fibers. But if you go to the 6-12 rep range, then failure is not optional anymore. You have to go to failure to stimulate those high threshold fibers.
Furthermore, this is way too much. There is no way you are going to make progressions from this type of workout. You are simply creating too many nerve paths and confusing the hell out of your muscles. If you do 21 sets for biceps then how many will you do for legs? 61?
In my personal opinion this workout is only for the advanced athlete and the chemically enhanced athletes. Advanced would be someone like Scott who can rep out 225 bench press, 315 squats, 400lbs deadlifts. Chemically enhanced would be someone who is stacking test,HGH and insulin (!).
If you are a beginner or intermediate and you cant destroy your biceps with 4 sets of weighted chin-ups and 2-3 sets of barbell curls, you are doing something wrong. Either your technique is wrong or your intensity is not there.
I would love to see different opinions from different Hermanites.
As much as I love seeing Marky Mark progress (Please don't beat me up, Mr. Wahlberg!)...this routine is for the HIGHLY advanced and crazy insane. I stick to 3, 4 exercises per muscle group MAX with those rep ranges and 4 sets for SMALL muscle groups (biceps are a small muscle group). I do 3 exercises on average with rep range max being 12, and max 4 sets....and I'm huffing and puffing by the time I'm done, with biceps COMPLETELY engorged with blood...which is what I want to do. My advice? Don't listen to what celebs tell you, DO WHAT WORKS FOR YOU!
C'mon Nate, that was MONTHS ago, get with the program, lol! Seriously though, I've gone back to training them once, maybe twice a week now and going back to my former routines with some tweeks and changes.