Hi Scott and friends! Super sorry for this long post, but it's been a long time coming. I got some great advice from Scott about training beginners on compound lifts at the LA Fitness expo earlier this year, and I spent some time applying it before coming to tell you about my experience with it. (If it rings a bell, I have super short hair and a "killer broccoli attacking a city" phone case that you complimented!)
I spent February and March applying the advice you gave me before I planned on applying it to some if my client programs. I paired bench press with push-ups tacked on to the end, and I saw some strength gain as I went from 6 solid push-ups with good form to 10 in a very short time. I saw a correlation in strength between my push-up reps increasing and my bench press strength improving. I've been applying the same principle to my pull-up training by pairing my assisted band pull-ups with lat pull down to be able to put a number on my strength improvements and to pump out some extra volume. It's helped me to be more patient with the process of earning my pull-ups, because I was pretty frustrated with feeling like I wasn't getting anywhere for a while, but I know patience is key.
So, thank you for the sound and practical advice! Please let me know if there are any fallacies with my thinking because I'm always open to improving my training methods.
I have one problem that I could use other people's insight on right now. I joined a church's healthy lifestyle program called 'Operation Healthy Lives' and got paired up with a coach that had training experience, but hasn't trained anyone full time in 10 years. I respect him very much, but we disagree on a few things about training and weight loss. He focuses heavily on the 'calories burned' per workout, and told me that if I'm working out for an hour, I'm burning around 600 calories and therefore need to eat more, but I disagree with this set in stone number he's given me.
I think that most people overestimate the number of calories they burn in their workouts, but please correct me on this if I'm wrong. I prefer to think about my workouts as an opportunity to develop competency and good form in the 5 basic human movements, the squat, hinge, push, pull and lunge. Focusing on calories burned really messes with my head since I used to be heavily overweight and a binge-eater, so when I train, I train for movement efficiency. Nutrition is for fat loss. Training is for improving how I move! Any weight loss or muscle gain that occurs is a bonus, but not my focus.
Currently, I'm not dealing with hunger or fatigue during workouts or during the day. I love my meals, and I lost 5 of water weight in the first week. So his advice feels a little off. If I've learned anything over the last few years of training (and watching your content), it's that if you're getting results from your program, don't up and change it. I feel this is a case of 'too eager to want to give advice' because we had just started and he simply wants to find any way he can to help me hit my peak, but I could be wrong. Maybe he's right, and I'm letting my own biases get in the way.
What's Scott and Co.'s opinion on this supposed 600 calories burned per 1 hour of working out? I've been trying to discuss it with him, but it's been coming down to a 'he is right' and 'I am wrong' anytime I try to get a better explanation into his reasoning or try to discuss it as professionals. Thanks for all of your help and consideration!